Jump to content
Post-Update: Forum Issues Read more... ×
BPAL Madness!
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    55
  • comments
    94
  • views
    3,907

It amuses me to be seen as a monster

Sign in to follow this  
antimony

463 views

My boyfriend is very involved in politics right now, so we seem to be going to multiple events every week. Last night, we went to a meet-and-greet for two candidates, a woman running for the state Senate, and a man running for the Federal House. (My boyfriend is working quite actively on the guy's campaign)

 

My sweetie is *extremely* progressive. We don't always see eye-to-eye, but we are always respectful of each other's views, and we take the time to understand each other's positions.

 

As for my own beliefs, I'm a little disillusioned, kinda cynical, and am a strong believer in financial accountability, personal privacy, plain dealing, and giving everyone an equal opportunity - though what they do with it is their own business. 40 years ago, I may have been called a republican, but now, I just don't believe there is a place on the political spectrum for me, though I stick with the democrats, since the current republicans don't share my stance on *anything* (*grumble*grumble*fiscal mismanagement*grumble*insane war*grumble*intruding on my personal life*grumble*lying SOBs*grumble*grumble*)

 

Let me preface my story by saying that the event was early in the evening, so I didn't change after work. I was wearing an ankle-length black velvet skirt, a button down shirt, and high heels.

 

There was another lady there, who was wering a hat covered in progressive pins, and who was putting off a very activist vibe. (Which is fine, it's her right... But personally, I find wearing advertising, whether commercial or political, a little tacky. I am not a billboard.) I didn't think any less of her, after all I'm living in sin with a guy who is hanging out way to the Left of me politically. But anyway, she didn't seem to like the look of me.

 

Anyway, in the course of conversation she lets loose with the statement that we should never have electronic voting machines because she doesn't want the democratic process to be ar the mercy of energy companies. I'm thinking, fat lot of good paper ballots do you if the lights are out! So I respond with mentioning that that could easily be adressed by requiring polling places only be set up in buildings that have generators (since the polling places are usually schools, community centers, and government buildings, it's fair to say a lot of them already have generators anyway) She looked at me like I had sprouted tentacles for even accepting the idea of electronic voting machines.

 

I am of the opinion that the current electronic voting machine technology is a travesty. But this is America, and people like things that are shiny, new, and space-age. So we have to accept that they will continue to exist, and push legislation that requires a paper trail, verifiable security measures, and publicly auditable code. Honestly, if we took the requirements Nevada sets on slot machines and made the same requirements on voting machines, we'd be 90% of the way there.

 

Well, that only made it worse! I was clearly mocking democracy by comparing voting machines to slot machines!

 

She then railed on about how the requirements that I was talking about were never going to happen, and I was living in a dream world of woulda-coulda-shoulda. But *she* was only concerned with reality. And reality to her, was that because the voting machines available now were criminal, and paper works just fine, that the correct answer is to ban electronic voting machines, and go back to paper. Now who is in a dream world of woulda-coulda-shoulda? You can't put the shaving cream back in the can. Electronic voting is out there, people have bought into it, and I don't see any chance of it being abandoned wholesale across the country. Maybe we didn't need it, but we've got it, so as Tim Gunn says, we have to make it work.

 

So, in the course of this discussion, she is squirming in her seat like she wants to scoot as far away from me as possible, throwing up her hands and exclaiming over and over again how she just can't talk to someone like me, and that I'm just impossible, and that introducing electronic voting machies was just like starting the Iraq war, and whatever. By the end of the conversation, I might as well have been Richard Nixon and Cthuhlu's love child.

 

This has caused me no end of amusement.

 

The whole drive home I was asking Rusty how he likes dating an evil republican baby-eater. :eek:

Sign in to follow this  


3 Comments


Recommended Comments

:rantrave:

 

I run away quickly from people like her. You can see it in their eyes, that burning desire to latch onto anyone with a differing viewpoint so they can exclaim over and over how wrong other people are and how right they are.

 

When one of them does manage to latch onto me I spend the next week feeling irritated about the whole thing... and sometimes even years into the future I'm still dreaming up the perfect comeback lines to the inane stuff the person was spouting. Yeah, it really gets under my skin.

Share this comment


Link to comment

The part that drives me most insane is that I am on her side, damnit.

 

I hate when people who hold any polarized political opinions get all sniffy at moderates, like we're some kind of wishy-washy fence-sitters.

 

Eh, Rusty reminded me that just before she tore into me, I was ranting about how the federal government needs to move from using cost acounting to accrual accounting, so we can just maybe start to get a handle on when and where money *really* comes and goes. And everyone knows that people who know too much about accounting *must* be mindless corporate drones.

Share this comment


Link to comment

She probably didn't understand what you were talking about re: cost v. accrual accounting, because it wasn't a passionate black v. white issue that she could wrap her brain around. :lol:

 

It is hard to be a moderate-anything nowadays *sigh* Any extreme, whether radical or reactionary, is so irritating because there's no thought put into it, it's like talking to a brick wall. :rantrave:

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×